m5彩票|平台登录

                                                    Informatica

                                                    Analysis of Informatica and its PowerCenter line of data integration products. Related subjects include:

                                                    July 20, 2014

                                                    Data integration as a business opportunity

                                                    A significant fraction of IT professional services industry revenue comes from data integration. But as a software business, data integration has been more problematic. Informatica, the largest independent data integration software vendor, does $1 billion in revenue. INFA’s enterprise value (market capitalization after adjusting for cash and debt) is $3 billion, which puts it way short of other category leaders such as VMware, and even sits behind Tableau.* When I talk with data integration startups, I ask questions such as “What fraction of Informatica’s revenue are you shooting for?” and, as a follow-up, “Why would that be grounds for excitement?”

                                                    *If you believe that Splunk is a data integration company, that changes these observations only a little.

                                                    On the other hand, several successful software categories have, at particular points in their history, been focused on data integration. One of the major benefits of 1990s business intelligence was “Combines data from multiple sources on the same screen” and, in some cases, even “Joins data from multiple sources in a single view”. The last few years before application servers were commoditized, data integration was one of their chief benefits. Data warehousing and Hadoop both of course have a “collect all your data in one place” part to their stories — which I call data mustering — and Hadoop is a data transformation tool as well.

                                                    Read more

                                                    October 31, 2012

                                                    Notes and comments — October 31, 2012

                                                    Time for another catch-all post. First and saddest — one of the earliest great commenters on this blog, and a beloved figure in the Boston-area database community, was Dan Weinreb, whom I had known since some Symbolics briefings in the early 1980s. He passed away recently, much much much too young. Looking back for a couple of examples — even if you’ve never heard of him before, I see that Dan ‘s 2009 comment on Tokutek is still interesting today, and so is a post on his own blog disagreeing with some of my choices in terminology.

                                                    Otherwise, in no particular order:

                                                    1. Chris Bird is learning MongoDB. As is common for Chris, his comments are both amusing and enlightening.

                                                    2. When I relayed Cloudera’s comments on Hadoop adoption, I left out a couple of categories. One Cloudera called “mobile”; when I probed, that was about HBase, with an example being messaging apps.

                                                    The other was “phone home” — i.e., the ingest of machine-generated data from a lot of different devices. This is something that’s obviously been coming for several years — but I’m increasingly getting the sense that it’s actually arrived.

                                                    Read more

                                                    August 24, 2012

                                                    Hadoop notes: Informatica, Splunk, and IBM

                                                    Informatica, Splunk, and IBM are all public companies, and correspondingly reticent to talk about product futures. Hence, anything I might suggest about product futures from any of them won’t be terribly detailed, and even the vague generalities are “the Good Lord willin’ an’ the creek don’ rise”.

                                                    Never let a rising creek overflow your safe harbor.

                                                    Anyhow:

                                                    1. Hadoop can be an awesome ETL (Extract/Transform/Load) execution engine; it can handle huge jobs and perform a great variety of transformations. (Indeed, MapReduce was invented to run giant ETL jobs.) Thus, if one offers a development-plus-execution stack for ETL processes, it might seem appealing to make Hadoop an ETL execution option. And so:

                                                    Informatica told me about other interesting Hadoop-related plans as well, but I’m not sure my frieNDA allows me to mention them at all.

                                                    IBM, however, is standing aside. Specifically, IBM told me that it doesn’t see the point of doing the same thing, as its ETL engine — presumably derived from the old Ascential product line — is already parallel and performant enough.

                                                    2. Last year, I suggested that Splunk and Hadoop are competitors in managing machine-generated data. That’s still true, but Splunk is also preparing a Hadoop co-opetition strategy. To a first approximation, it’s just Hadoop import/export. However, suppose you view Splunk as offering a three-layer stack: Read more

                                                    August 8, 2012

                                                    HCatalog — yes, it matters

                                                    To a first approximation, HCatalog is the thing that will make Hadoop play nicely with all kinds of ETLT (Extract/Transform/Load/Transform). However, HCatalog is both less and more than that:

                                                    The base use case for HCatalog is:

                                                    Major variants on that include: Read more

                                                    March 16, 2012

                                                    Juggling analytic databases

                                                    I’d like to survey a few related ideas:

                                                    Here goes. Read more

                                                    October 9, 2008

                                                    Everybody’s putting integration services in the cloud

                                                    Both Pervasive Software and Cast Iron Systems told me recently of fairly pure cloud offerings. In this, they’re joining Informatica, which started offering Salesforce.com integration-as-a-service back in 2006. So far as I can tell, the three vendors are doing somewhat different things. Read more

                                                    March 21, 2008

                                                    Cast Iron Systems focuses on SaaS data integration

                                                    When I wrote about data integration vendor Cast Iron Systems a year ago, its core message was “simplicity, simplicity, simplicity.” Supporting points included:

                                                    1. An appliance delivery format.
                                                    2. Lots of heuristics for automatic mapping and quick set-up. E.g., Cast Iron claims that 70% of a typical SAP-Salesforce.com connection can be done straight out of the box.
                                                    3. The absence of data cleaning/transformation features that might complicate things.

                                                    Cast Iron still believes in all that.

                                                    Even so, its messaging has changed a bit. Cast Iron now bills itself, in the first sentence of its press release boilerplate, as “the fastest growing SaaS integration appliance vendor.” And when I talked with marketing chief Simon Peel today, the only use cases we discussed were connections between SaaS and on-premises apps. Read more

                                                    January 14, 2008

                                                    Intelligent Enterprise’s list of 12/36/48 vendors

                                                    I’m getting a flood of press releases today, because many of the companies I write about were selected to Intelligent Enterprise’s list of 12 most influential vendors plus 36 more to watch in the areas Intelligent Enterprise covers (which seems to be pretty much the analytics-related parts of what I write about here and on Text Technologies). It looks like a pretty reasonable list, although I think they forced the issue in some of the small analytics vendors they selected, and of course anybody can quibble with some of the omissions.

                                                    Among the companies they cited, you can find topical categories here for IBM (and Cognos), Informatica, Microsoft, Netezza, Oracle, SAP/Business Objects (both), SAS, and Teradata; QlikTech; Cast Iron, Coral8, DATAllegro, HP, ParAccel, and StreamBase; and Software AG. On Text Technologies you’ll find categories for some of the same vendors, plus Attensity, Clarabridge, and Google. There also are categories for some of these vendors on the Monash Report.

                                                    October 20, 2007

                                                    Wrinkles in the Informatica versus Business Objects patent litigation

                                                    Business Objects recently lost a patent lawsuit to Informatica in the area of data integration. While I was at the Business Objects conference, I asked about it, and was told in effect “It’s no big deal. In fact, the monetary award was reduced. Anyhow, we shipped a non-infringing version within 12 days after the decision, and sales are rolling along.” I then reflected that answer back to Informatica’s stellar analyst relations guy Chas Kielt. He checked with corporate counsel, and sent back the detailed clarification below. Since I got my Business Objects answers from a couple of caught-off-guard non-lawyer French guys, while Chas got a careful explanation of an American court’s judgment from an American lawyer, I’m inclined to think that in any details where they might conflict, Chas’ version is more likely to be accurate.

                                                    There’s a more substantive disagreement as to whether the features deleted from BOBJ’s product due to the injunction are actually important in the marketplace. I’m looking into that subject, and hope to post about it in the near future. Read more

                                                    March 17, 2007

                                                    The boom in Salesforce.com integration

                                                    SaaS integration is in the air.

                                                    But of course this makes sense. Without good data integration, SaaS applications would be pretty useless, at least at large and medium-sized enterprises.

                                                    Next Page →

                                                    Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

                                                    Login

                                                    Search our blogs and white papers

                                                    Monash Research blogs

                                                    User consulting

                                                    Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

                                                    Vendor advisory

                                                    We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

                                                    Monash Research highlights

                                                    Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.

                                                                                                      culture

                                                                                                      mailbox

                                                                                                      news

                                                                                                      explore

                                                                                                      Buddhism

                                                                                                      car

                                                                                                      Go abroad

                                                                                                      mailbox

                                                                                                      Foreign exchange